Birkbeck Law Review
  • Home
  • About
    • Submissions
    • Join Us
  • Publications
    • Volume 7 Issue 1
    • Volume 6 Issue 1
    • Volume 5 Issue 1
    • Volume 4 Issue 1
    • Volume 3 Issue 2
    • Volume 3 Issue 1
    • Volume 2 Issue 2
    • Volume 2 Issue 1
    • Volume 1 Issue 2
    • Volume 1 Issue 1
  • Conference
    • 2019 Dystopias here and now
    • 2017 Law and the City
    • 2015 Migration, Borders, Violence
    • 2014 Privacy and Surveillance
  • Blog
  • Contact

Should there be life sentences without parole?

4/2/2014

 
The use of sentences within England and Wales is a topic that always divides the opinion of the public. However, over the last few years, there has been a fresh argument, made that those who have a life sentence without the chance of parole is in breach of their human rights. Back in 2012 convicted murderer Jeremy Bamber, along with two other prisoners, made the first steps in challenging against their sentences by appealing to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Their primary argument being that the sentence is in breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

At the end of last month, it was found that the Grand Chamber, the highest court of the ECtHR, held that there is a breach of Article 3. This was held because there is no review process, for those given life without parole sentences. In addition, although in principle there is no issue with these sentences, on a practical level there should be a review process after twenty five years. This decision has caused controversy for both politicians and the judiciary. Furthermore, there has been criticism from victims of crime and members of the public who believe that prisoners should not be entitled to rights. It is because of this ruling that the Court of Appeal is now set to hear three new appeals contesting this type of sentence.

It is important to remember, that although the appeal on human rights grounds has been successful this does not stop judges giving life without parole sentences at the present time. What makes this a hot topic of debate is the upcoming sentence of the murderers of Fusilier Lee Rigby. Mr Justice Sweeny, who presided over the murder trial, has delayed sentencing until the appeal(s) for this type of sentence have been ruled upon.

In summary, whatever the outcome for the use of life without parole sentences the debate on whether life should mean life will continue to divide everyone in society rather than just those in the legal and political world.

For more information on this topic please use the following links:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20520372

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25450555

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25870832

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23245254

    Blog

    This is where news and short pieces of work will be uploaded.


    If you are interested in submitting content for the blog please contact us at features@bbklr.org.  

    Archives

    July 2018
    October 2016
    April 2016
    December 2014
    October 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Citizenship
    South Sudan
    Sudan
    Women

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

Site Map
Home
About
Submissions
Join Us
Blog
Publications
Events
Contact
Mailing Address 
Birkbeck Law Review
Birkbeck, University of London
Malet Street
London WC1E 7HX
United Kingdom
 

Contact Us:
admin@bbklr.org


Subscribe
Stay in touch with the latest news and information from the Birkbeck Law Review
Join our Mailing List
Copyright © 2012 - 2020 Birkbeck Law Review | A Publication of the Birkbeck Law Review Trust | (Print) ISSN 2052-1308 (Online) ISSN 2052-1316
All images, unless otherwise attributed, and the Birkbeck Law Review logo are © the Birkbeck Law Review and are NOT licensed under Creative Commons. All rights reserved.
Photo used under Creative Commons from nolifebeforecoffee